Relationship between the different patterns of ossicularchain injury and the presence or absence of associatedcomplications in patients with cholesteatoma

Main Article Content

Juliana Montero Cortés
Rodrigo Posada Trujillo
Clara Sofía Oñate Carrillo
Andrea Hortúa Bayona

Abstract

Introduction: Cholesteatoma is a benign lesion characterized by its expansive and destructive character, which may erode the temporal bone and generate intra- and extratemporal complications. Management is surgical, and goals include creating a safe and dry cavity, preventing recurrence of the disease, and improving hearing. Nationally and internationally, there is little literature where the main intrasurgi­cal findings of the ossicular chain in patients with this pathology are identified. Methodology: A descriptive retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted, covering the clinical records of patients diagnosed with cholesteatoma who un­derwent mastoidectomy treated at the Clinics Esimed Comfamiliar Pereira and Risaralda in the period between 1981 and 2016. Results: In total, there were 1410 patients with a diagnosis of cholesteatoma who were treated surgically; 65.6% (925 patients) were managed with the diagnosis of cholesteatoma without associa­ted complications. In most patients, ossicular chain compromise was found, and only 163 patients (11.5%) had an intact ossicular chain, the highest percentage associated with the diagnosis of cholesteatoma without associated complication (76.6%). When compromise of the ossicular chain was found, the most affected ossicle was the incus in 1181 patients (83.8%).

Article Details

Section

Trabajos Originales

How to Cite

1.
Relationship between the different patterns of ossicularchain injury and the presence or absence of associatedcomplications in patients with cholesteatoma. Acta otorrinolaringol cir cabeza cuello [Internet]. 2026 Feb. 9 [cited 2026 Feb. 10];53(4):343-9. Available from: https://revista.acorl.org.co/index.php/acorl/article/view/783

References

1. Stott C, Ortega G, Bravo G, Délano PH. Cirugía del colesteatoma y audición. Rev Otorrinolaringol Cir Cabeza Cuello. 2013;73:243–248. doi: 10.4067/s0718-48162013000300006

2. Muñoz C, Macias LA, Cruz F. Colesteatoma de oído. An Radiol Mex. 2007;71–77.

3. Rosito LPS, Silva MNL, Selaimen FA, Jung YP, Pauletti MGT, Jung LP, et al. Características de 419 pacientes con colesteatoma adquirido de orelha média. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;83(2):126–131. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2016.02.013

4. Santos-Mejía B, Pineda-Cásarez F. Frecuencia de colesteatoma en el Hospital Regional Gral. Ignacio Zaragoza del ISSSTE. Rev Esp Med Quir. 2016;21(3):77–82.

5. Aquino JEAP, Filho NAC, Aquino JNP. Epidemiology of middle ear and mastoid cholesteatomas: study of 1146 cases. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;77(3):341–347. doi: 10.1590/ S1808-86942011000300012

6. Emmett SD, Kokesh J, Kaylie D. Chronic Ear Disease. Med Clin North Am. 2018;102(6):1063–1079. doi: 10.1016/j. mcna.2018.06.008

7. Olsen JM, Ribeiro F de AQ, Yasui MMM, Santos ITR. Hearing loss assessment in primary and secondary acquired cholesteatoma. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;81(6):653–657. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2014.11.009

8. Vikram BK, Udayashankar SG, Naseeruddin K, Venkatesha BK, Manjunath D, Savantrewwa IR. Complications in primary and secondary acquired cholesteatoma: a prospective comparative study of 62 ears. Am J Otolaryngol. 2008;29(1):1– 6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2006.11.014

9. Martins O, Victor J, Selesnickg S. The relationship between ossicular status and conductive hearing loss in cholesteatoma. Otol Neurotol. 2012;33(3):387–392. doi: 10.1097/ MAO.0b013e3182487fb0

10. Blom EF, Gunning MN, Kleinrensink NJ, Lokin ASHJ, Bruijnzeel H, Smit AL, et al. Influence of ossicular chain damage on hearing after chronic otitis media and cholesteatoma surgery: A systematic review and metaanalysis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;141(11):974–982. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2015.2269

11. Kim HH, Battista RA, Kumar A, Wiet RJ. Should ossicular reconstruction be staged following tympanomastoidectomy. Laryngoscope. 2006;116(1):47–51. doi: 10.1097/01. mlg.0000185601.98903.34

12. McGuire JK, Wasl H, Harris T, Copley GJ, Fagan JJ. Management of pediatric cholesteatoma based on presentations, complications, and outcomes. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;80:69–73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.10.041

13. Albera R, Canale A, Piumetto E, Lacilla M, Dagna F. Ossicular chain lesions in cholesteatoma. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2012;32(5):309–13.

14. Mohammadi G, Naderpour M, Mousaviagdas M. Ossicular erosion in patients requiring surgery for cholesteatoma. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;24(68):125–128. doi: 10.22038/ ijorl.2012.184

15. Maresh A, Martins OF, Victor JD, Selesnick SH. Using surgical observations of ossicular erosion patterns to characterize cholesteatoma growth. Otol Neurotol. 2011;32(8):1239–1242. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31822e5b5d

16. Carrillo RJC, Yang NW, Abes GT. Probabilities of ossicular discontinuity in chronic suppurative otitis media using pure-tone audiometry. Otol Neurotol. 2007;28(8):1034–1037. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31815882a6

17. Ng SK, Yip WWL, Suen M, Abdullah VJ, Hasselt CA. Autograft ossiculoplasty in cholesteatoma surgery: Is it feasible? Laryngoscope. 2003;113(5):843–847. doi: 10.1097/00005537- 200305000-00013