Evaluation of postoperative outcomes of septoplasty and septoturbinoplasty patients of Fundación Santa Fe de Bogota between the years 2016 to 2018

Main Article Content

Aldana-Gallego G
Peñaranda-Sanjuan A
Moreno SM
Pérez-García IC

Abstract

ABSTRACT


Introduction: infection rate after elective nasal surgery is very low which makes routine antibiotic prophylaxis redundant. In Colombia we do not have information about postoperative infection in septoplasty. A study was designed to determine the postoperative infection rate in patients undergoing septoplasty or septoplasty and turbinoplasty at Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá between 2016 to 2018. Methods: an
observational, descriptive and retrospective study was conducted. The database of the Otolaryngology Section was reviewed. The proportion of infection for all individuals participating in the study was calculated in a general and stratified manner by use of prophylactic and postoperative antibiotic and the frequency of complications was described. Results: we found 255 patients in the patient database of which 206
patients met the inclusion criteria. 23.3 % of patients received prophylactic antibiotic and 24.76 % received postoperative antibiotic. The percentage of postoperative infection was 2.91 % (95 % CI: 1.07-6.23). 96.6 % of the patients did not present any complications. Conclusion: septoplasty has a low risk of infection which was in accordance to the findings found in the present study.

Article Details

Section

Trabajos Originales

How to Cite

1.
Evaluation of postoperative outcomes of septoplasty and septoturbinoplasty patients of Fundación Santa Fe de Bogota between the years 2016 to 2018. Acta otorrinolaringol cir cabeza cuello [Internet]. 2020 Sep. 30 [cited 2025 Aug. 29];48(3):226-31. Available from: https://revista.acorl.org.co/index.php/acorl/article/view/503

References

Georgiou I, Farber N, Mendes D, Winkler E. The role of antibiotics in rhinoplasty and septoplasty: a literature review. Rhinology. 2008;46(4):267-270.

Wiesmiller K, Keck T, Rettinger G, Leiacker R, Dzida R, Lindemann J. Nasal air conditioning in patients before and after septoplasty with bilateral turbinoplasty. Laryngoscope.2006;116(6):890-894. doi:10.1097/01.mlg.0000201995.02171.ea

Ismi O, Ozcan C, Vayısoğlu Y, Öztürk C, Tek SA, Görür K. Transseptal suturing technique in septoplasty: impact

on bacteremia and nosocomial colonization. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;274(5):2189-2195. doi:10.1007/

s00405-017-4479-x

Rhee JS, Book DT, Burzynski M, Smith TL. Quality of life assessment in nasal airway obstruction. Laryngoscope.

;113(7):1118-1122. doi:10.1097/00005537-200307000-00004

Krouse JH. The unified airway--conceptual framework. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2008;41(2):257-v. doi:10.1016/j.otc.2007.11.002

Moche JA, Palmer O. Surgical management of nasal obstruction.Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2012;24(2):229-viii.doi:10.1016/j.coms.2012.01.013

Chandra RK, Patadia MO, Raviv J. Diagnosis of nasal airway obstruction. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2009;42(2):207-vii.doi:10.1016/j.otc.2009.01.004

Colsanitas, 2019 [Nota: por favor suministrar los datos completos de esta referencia]

Dąbrowska-Bień J, Skarżyński PH, Gwizdalska I, Łazęcka K, Skarżyński H. Complications in septoplasty based on a large group of 5639 patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol.2018; 275(7): 1789–1794. Published online 2018 May 16. doi:10.1007/s00405-018-4990-8