Audiological and quality of life outcomes in patients with transition from BAHA Connect® to BAHA Attract®

Main Article Content

Ordóñez-Ordóñez Leonardo Elías
Corredor-García GE
Angulo-Martínez ES

Abstract

Introduction: the percutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid, has been successfully used. However, a significant number of patients report repetitive skin reactions. The transcutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid is an alternative that can solve these complications.With this study we aim to describe the audiological results and changes in the quality of life in patients who required transition from the percutaneous to the transcutaneous system.Methods: descriptive observational study, patients with percutaneous hearing implants who required transition to the transcutaneous system were included. Hearing performance was assessed using a noisy background test and the quality of life scale “Glasgow Benefit Inventory”-GBI- was applied

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Leonardo Elías O-O, GE C-G, SC V, ES A-M. Audiological and quality of life outcomes in patients with transition from BAHA Connect® to BAHA Attract®. Acta otorrinolaringol cir cabeza cuello [Internet]. 2020Sep.30 [cited 2024Jul.3];48(3):218 - 225. Available from: https://revista.acorl.org.co/index.php/acorl/article/view/554
Section
Trabajos Originales
Author Biography

Ordóñez-Ordóñez Leonardo Elías

Otólogo- Otorrinolaringólogo

Clínica Universitaria Colombia-Fundación Universitaria Sanitas

Hospital Militar Central-Universidad Militar Nueva Granada

References

Snik AF, Mylanus EA, Proops DW, Wolfaardt JF, Hodgetts WE, Somers T, et al. Consensus statements on the BAHA system: where do we stand at present?. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 2005;195:2-12. doi:10.1177/0003489405114s1201

Verstraeten N, Zarowski AJ, Somers T, Riff D, Offeciers EF. Comparison of the audiologic results obtained with the boneanchored hearing aid attached to the headband, the testband, and to the “snap” abutment. Otol Neurotol. 2009;30(1):70-75. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e31818be97a

Kruyt IJ, Bakkum KHE, Caspers CJI, Hol MKS. The efficacy of bone-anchored hearing implant surgery in children: A systematic review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;132:109906.doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.109906

Kim G, Ju HM, Lee SH, Kim HS, Kwon JA, Seo YJ. Efficacy of Bone-Anchored Hearing Aids in Single-Sided Deafness: A Systematic Review. Otol Neurotol. 2017;38(4):473-483.doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000001359

Dun CA, de Wolf MJ, Mylanus EA, Snik AF, Hol MK, Cremers CW. Bilateral bone-anchored hearing aid application in children: the Nijmegen experience from 1996 to 2008. Otol Neurotol. 2010;31(4):615-623. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181dbb37e

Shapiro S, Ramadan J, Cassis A. BAHA Skin Complications in the Pediatric Population: Systematic Review With Metaanalysis. Otol Neurotol. 2018;39(7):865-873. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000001877

Verheij E, Bezdjian A, Grolman W, Thomeer HG. A Systematic Review on Complications of Tissue Preservation Surgical Techniques in Percutaneous Bone Conduction Hearing Devices. Otol Neurotol. 2016;37(7):829-837. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000001091

Dun CA, Faber HT, de Wolf MJ, Mylanus EA, Cremers CW, Hol MK. Assessment of more than 1,000 implanted percutaneous bone conduction devices: skin reactions and implant survival. Otol Neurotol. 2012;33(2):192-198. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e318241c0bf

Pross SE, Layton A, Tong K, Lustig LR. Cost of placement and complications associated with osseointegrated bone-conducting hearing prostheses: a retrospective analysis of medicare billing data. Otol Neurotol. 2014;35(3):476-481. doi:10.1097/ MAO.0b013e31829ce78d

Kiringoda R, Lustig LR. A meta-analysis of the complications associated with osseointegrated hearing aids. Otol Neurotol. 2013;34(5):790-794. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e318291c651

de Wolf MJ, Hol MK, Huygen PL, Mylanus EA, Cremers CW. Clinical outcome of the simplified surgical technique for BAHA implantation. Otol Neurotol. 2008;29(8):1100-1108. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e31818599b8

Flynn M. Design concept and technological considerations for the Cochlear BAHA 4 Attract System. Report E82744. 2013;1-7.

Carr SD, Bruce IA, Jones D, Ray J. Outcomes following conversion of a percutaneous to a transcutaneous bone

conduction device in eight children. Clinical Otolaryngology. 2017;42:917–20. doi: 10.1111/coa.12828

Cedars E, Chan D, Lao A, Hardies L, Meyer A, Rosbe K. Conversion of traditional osseointegrated bone-anchored hearing aids to the Baha® attract in four pediatric patients. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;91:37-42. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.09.033

Gawęcki W, Stieler OM, Balcerowiak A, Komar D, Gibasiewicz R, Karlik M, Szyfter-Harris J, Wróbel M. Surgical, functional and audiological evaluation of new Baha(®) Attract system implantations. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;273(10):3123- 30. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-3917-5

Iseri M, Orhan KS, Tuncer U, Kara A, Durgut M, Guldiken Y, et al. Transcutaneous Bone-anchored Hearing Aids Versus Percutaneous Ones: Multicenter Comparative Clinical Study. Otol Neurotol. 2015;36(5):849-53. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000733

Sanchez-Cuadrado I, Lassaletta L, Perez-Mora R, Muñoz E, Gavilan J. Reliability and validity of the Spanish Glasgow Benefit Inventory after cochlear implant surgery in adults. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;272(2):333-336. doi:10.1007/s00405-013-2844-y

Robinson K, Gatehouse S, Browning GG. Measuring patient benefit from otorhinolaryngological surgery and

therapy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1996;105(6):415-422. doi:10.1177/000348949610500601

Kraai T, Brown C, Neeff M, Fisher K. Complications of bone-anchored hearing aids in pediatric patients. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;75(6):749-753. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.01.018

Ordóñez-Ordóñez LE, Rey TG, Angulo-Martínez ES, Rodríguez SR, Vanegas SC and Guzmán Durán JE. Abstract:

Clinical Experience with Sophono Alpha 2 MPO™ in Conductive, Mixed and Sensorineural Hearing Losses Patients. J Otolaryngol ENT Res. 2017;9(2):00279. doi: 10.15406/joentr.2017.09.00279.

Bezdjian A, Bruijnzeel H, Daniel SJ, Grolman W, Thomeer HGXM. Preliminary audiologic and peri-operative outcomes of the Sophono™ transcutaneous bone conduction device: A systematic review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;101:196-203. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.08.014

Zernotti ME, Di Gregorio MF, Galeazzi P, Tabernero P. Comparative outcomes of active and passive hearing devices by transcutaneous bone conduction. Acta Otolaryngol. 2016;136(6):556-558. doi:10.3109/00016489.2016.1143119

Sharma S, Reddy-Kolanu G, Marshall AH. UK tertiary centre experience of outcomes from osseointegrated transcutaneous magnetic bone conduction hearing system implanted in twentyfive patients using a linear incision technique. Clin Otolaryngol. 2017;42(5):1041-1043. doi:10.1111/coa.12815

Lau K, Scotta G, Wright K, Proctor V, Greenwood L, Dawoud M, et al. First United Kingdom experience of the novel Osia active transcutaneous piezoelectric bone conduction implant. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2020. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06022-7

Hendry J, Chin A, Swan IR, Akeroyd MA, Browning GG. The Glasgow Benefit Inventory: a systematic review of the use and value of an otorhinolaryngological generic patient-recorded outcome measure. Clin Otolaryngol. 2016;41(3):259-75. doi:10.1111/coa.12518.

Arunachalam PS, Kilby D, Meikle D, Davison T, Johnson IJ. Bone-anchored hearing aid quality of life assessed by Glasgow Benefit Inventory. Laryngoscope. 2001;111(7):1260-1263.doi:10.1097/00005537-200107000-00022