Evaluation of postoperative outcomes of septoplasty and septoturbinoplasty patients of Fundación Santa Fe de Bogota between the years 2016 to 2018

Main Article Content

Aldana-Gallego G
Peñaranda-Sanjuan A
Moreno SM
Pérez-García IC

Abstract

ABSTRACT


Introduction: infection rate after elective nasal surgery is very low which makes routine antibiotic prophylaxis redundant. In Colombia we do not have information about postoperative infection in septoplasty. A study was designed to determine the postoperative infection rate in patients undergoing septoplasty or septoplasty and turbinoplasty at Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá between 2016 to 2018. Methods: an
observational, descriptive and retrospective study was conducted. The database of the Otolaryngology Section was reviewed. The proportion of infection for all individuals participating in the study was calculated in a general and stratified manner by use of prophylactic and postoperative antibiotic and the frequency of complications was described. Results: we found 255 patients in the patient database of which 206
patients met the inclusion criteria. 23.3 % of patients received prophylactic antibiotic and 24.76 % received postoperative antibiotic. The percentage of postoperative infection was 2.91 % (95 % CI: 1.07-6.23). 96.6 % of the patients did not present any complications. Conclusion: septoplasty has a low risk of infection which was in accordance to the findings found in the present study.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
G A-G, A P-S, SM M, IC P-G. Evaluation of postoperative outcomes of septoplasty and septoturbinoplasty patients of Fundación Santa Fe de Bogota between the years 2016 to 2018. Acta otorrinolaringol cir cabeza cuello [Internet]. 2020Sep.30 [cited 2024Nov.21];48(3):226 - 31. Available from: https://revista.acorl.org.co/index.php/acorl/article/view/503
Section
Trabajos Originales

References

Georgiou I, Farber N, Mendes D, Winkler E. The role of antibiotics in rhinoplasty and septoplasty: a literature review. Rhinology. 2008;46(4):267-270.

Wiesmiller K, Keck T, Rettinger G, Leiacker R, Dzida R, Lindemann J. Nasal air conditioning in patients before and after septoplasty with bilateral turbinoplasty. Laryngoscope.2006;116(6):890-894. doi:10.1097/01.mlg.0000201995.02171.ea

Ismi O, Ozcan C, Vayısoğlu Y, Öztürk C, Tek SA, Görür K. Transseptal suturing technique in septoplasty: impact

on bacteremia and nosocomial colonization. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;274(5):2189-2195. doi:10.1007/

s00405-017-4479-x

Rhee JS, Book DT, Burzynski M, Smith TL. Quality of life assessment in nasal airway obstruction. Laryngoscope.

;113(7):1118-1122. doi:10.1097/00005537-200307000-00004

Krouse JH. The unified airway--conceptual framework. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2008;41(2):257-v. doi:10.1016/j.otc.2007.11.002

Moche JA, Palmer O. Surgical management of nasal obstruction.Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2012;24(2):229-viii.doi:10.1016/j.coms.2012.01.013

Chandra RK, Patadia MO, Raviv J. Diagnosis of nasal airway obstruction. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2009;42(2):207-vii.doi:10.1016/j.otc.2009.01.004

Colsanitas, 2019 [Nota: por favor suministrar los datos completos de esta referencia]

Dąbrowska-Bień J, Skarżyński PH, Gwizdalska I, Łazęcka K, Skarżyński H. Complications in septoplasty based on a large group of 5639 patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol.2018; 275(7): 1789–1794. Published online 2018 May 16. doi:10.1007/s00405-018-4990-8